MR Digital
The one machines read. ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Google, Apple, Amazon and a dozen more read your shop already, exactly as it stands. Our job is to put something there they can use.
The check reads your shop the way an assistant does and emails the report in about a minute. Nothing is installed and nothing on your shop changes.It retrieves the raw text and the data behind it, then answers from that. A size chart inside a tab, a delivery time in a widget, a material shown only in a photograph: none of it exists as far as the answer is concerned. So good shops go unnamed while worse ones get recommended. The shop is fine. It simply cannot be read.
Both products below run the same engine. They read the descriptions the merchant already wrote, pull the comparable facts out of them, and publish those facts in the forms assistants consume. Nothing is invented, and nothing written by hand is ever overwritten.
Most of what is sold as AI visibility is a file, a scoreboard, or the same SEO with a new name. Here is what each one measurably does.
Most shop owners assume that ranking well on Google means an assistant will find them. The measurements say otherwise.
Ahrefs, 15,000 queries across four assistants, July 2025; 863,000 keywords and 4 million AI Overview citations, March 2026.
Google ranks pages. An assistant retrieves passages, then picks the ones it can quote. A page with ten years of backlinks and no stated fact contributes nothing to that answer. A page with no authority and a clear, structured description gets quoted.
This is what most AI visibility tools actually deliver: one text file at the root of the site, listing the pages. It is cheap to generate, which is why so many generate it. Google has stated it is not required and has no effect on visibility.
Both our products publish one too, linked to a clean text version of every page it names, because a few tools do read it. It is the smallest module here, not the product. A table of contents that points at unreadable pages points at nothing.
The other thing sold as AI visibility is a scoreboard: a tool types a handful of prompts into ChatGPT, counts how often you appear, and calls it your share of voice. Even a properly sampled average tells you the outcome on a given day, for a given phrasing, and nothing about the cause.
What can be measured is the step before the answer: which AI crawlers actually fetched your pages, and what they found there. That runs on your own server, it is a count and not a sample, and when it moves you know what you changed.
The market sells a file and a scoreboard. Neither reaches the reason. An assistant either has a fact to quote from your shop, or it does not.
One engine, two builds, because the platforms are not the same and a port would have been worse than either.
WordPress and WooCommerce
49 EUR one payment
Shopify
Free then 99 USD a year
The same surfaces on both platforms, built from your own words and published on your own domain.
Extends what your theme or SEO plugin already publishes. One Product node on the page, never two.
Read out of ordinary prose with a dictionary you control, in any language. An item with no attributes never makes a comparison table.
Built only from questions your shop can actually answer. Where there is no real answer, nothing is published.
Every product at its own address, without menus, scripts or layout. This is the page a crawler is offered.
Generated on request from what is published right now, linked to those text pages, never a file that goes stale on a timer.
On category and collection pages, comparing the figures your products actually state.
Alt text written from the product’s own attributes, where an image has none. What a human wrote is never replaced.
Asks your own site the way each crawler would, and names who got what back. A correct robots.txt proves nothing on its own.
GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, DeepSeekBot, DuckAssistBot, Applebot, Amazonbot, Bytespider, CCBot, Google-CloudVertexBot, MistralAI-User, Meta-ExternalAgent and more, each request checked against the operator’s own network.
Every value on the right is quoted from the description the shop already wrote. Nothing is generated, nothing is guessed, and the sentence each fact came from is shown beside it.
{ "@type": "Product",
"name": "Espresso Machine E20",
"image": "e20-front.jpg" }
No offer, no availability, no attributes. An assistant can name the product and nothing else.
"offers": { "price": "449", "priceCurrency": "EUR", "availability": "InStock" }
Hosting firewalls and password pages block AI crawlers silently. Nothing appears in your analytics, nothing breaks, your normal traffic is unaffected. This was a live result on one of our own domains, same page, same minute, only the name of the requester changed:
Perfect content on a page no assistant can fetch is worth nothing, and no amount of writing fixes it. So the check runs first, on both platforms, and tells you what to unblock before anything is published.
The free check
Type your address and the report arrives by email in about a minute. Nothing is installed, nothing on your shop changes, and you do not need to buy anything to read it.
The report is a page at a private link, not a PDF attachment. It is not indexed, and it is deleted after ninety days.
All three sell well, and we could have shipped them. They do nothing for the shop, so the effort went elsewhere.
A share of voice percentage graphs beautifully, but the answer changes per person, per session and per day. A number that cannot be reproduced measures nothing. We count the real crawler requests your site receives.
They would fill a site fast and feel like progress. Generated filler is increasingly downranked, so it damages what it claims to help, and publishing words you never wrote is not honest.
It would allow flattering revenue reports. We do not need it for what we do, so we never ask for it. Product content is read and written; orders, customers and payments are never touched.
Extraction runs on pattern matching, with no model involved. Nothing leaves your site, there is no cost per product, and the same description always produces the same result.
If you look after shops for other people, the work is the same on every one: install, run it once over the catalogue, and the client keeps whatever it publishes.
On WordPress the Studio licence covers five sites for 99 EUR, one payment, and a licence moves between sites whenever you want. Above five, and for white label, invoicing through your own company or a partner arrangement, write to us. On Shopify each store installs the app itself, so there is nothing to move.